ADDITIONAL INVESTIGATIONS, DISCOVERY & DOCUMENTATION OF ZERO COMMUNICATION POLICY OF HERO AND PETERSEN DEAN

UPDATED LETTER TO PETERSEN DEAN'S ATTORNEY SAM KARIMZADEH

INSURANCE FRAUD ON TOP OF FINANCIAL FRAUD
CC: CAP SPECIALTY INSURANCE
CC: CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE

CC:
LOS ANGELES COUNTY CONSUMER & BUSINESS AFFAIRS   

INTERNAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT

ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES

INVESTIGATION OF HERO AND PETERSEN DEAN 2016 JOB ON JENNIFER MARSHALL PROPERTY / PROPERTY TAX FINANCING FRAUD / INSURANCE FRAUD 

CC: Sam Luquin: Los Angeles & Business Consumer Affairs

UPDATED LETTER,  WITH NEW INFO RE CAP SPECIALTY LETTER WITH FALSE INFORMATION WRITTEN BY A PETERSEN DEAN ATTORNEY TO DECEIVE CAP SPECIALTY FOR THE PURPOSE OF ESCAPING LIABILITY

PETERSEN DEAN IS NOT LOOKING FORWARD TO THEIR DAY IN COURT, IN FACT THEY ARE FRANTIC TO AVOID A TRIAL BY JURY.

Dear Mr. Karimzadeh, Attorney for PETERSEN DEAN:

After the November 2, 2016 stucco accident (where a Petersen Dean attorney lied IN WRITING to CAP SPECIALTY INSURANCE, (which I was given a copy of ), indicating PETERSEN DEAN "had to do stucco work IN THE GARAGE", where there happens to be no stucco and that only a few pieces of silverware and a few dishes got coated with stucco powder, that powder moved in mysterious ways and miraculously stayed out of my my son's lungs, cut around corners and refused to go into the air vents and bypassed everything we owned and that two separate, unrelated, licensed remediation contractors, BUILDING CLEANING SERVICES and MIDA CLEANING SERVICES who provided PETERSEN DEAN with estimates wanted $4,000 + to clean a few pieces of silverware and a few dishes that PETERSEN DEAN offered to clean with leaf blowers and that the emergency room that treated James for the lung and breathing problems he had after inhaling powder from the cloud that filled his room and covered his bed, his clothing and all his toys, books and possessions while he was asleep in on November 2, 2016 in his room....all this, according to PETERSEN DEAN'S ATTORNEY'S letter to CAP SPECIALTY was nothing.... reduced to just a few forks and dishes. 

We should have scientists do a special investigation into this very talented stucco dust that has the ability to pick and chose what it will land upon, to form a cloud, go into a house and garage and refuse to land on most possessions, walls, ceilings, air vents, lungs and just specifically pick out a few items to land on. 

Even the contractors who were there that day will not commit perjury about magic stucco powder. They will NOT swear under penalty of perjury that they were doing stucco work IN THE GARAGE that had no stucco in it. They will not back the lie the PETERSEN DEAN attorney put in writing to CAP SPECIALTY that they were doing stucco work inside the garage. They know there was no stucco in the garage and they won't throw away their lives to protect PETERSEN DEAN with this ridiculous lie. Those contractors will not support the lies PETERSEN DEAN'S ATTORNEY put in writing to CAP SPECIALTY INSURANCE. You would be hard pressed to find any contractor on earth willing to throw away their life for such a foolish lie.

Probably no homeowner has stucco inside their garage. Have you every been inside a garage that has stucco on the interior walls? This has to be the sloppiest lie ever told and PETERSEN DEAN either believes CAP SPECIALTY is unbelievably stupid or willing to go along with criminal activity backed by ridiculous lies that no one would believe. 

PETERSEN DEAN contractors opened the garage and did not bother to close it when they finished altering the water heater. They were horrified by the mess they made, apologized and told their supervisor it would take them four days or more to clean up the mess they made, that they were not qualified to do the remediation and that they couldn't clean my son's bedding and clothes and toys, that they could not do it. They were told by their supervisors to do the remediation with leaf blowers.  

There was no reason to fill our house with stucco powder.  This was the sloppiest lie I ever read in my life and it is my belief that PETERSEN DEAN is desperate to avoid a trial by jury because they do not want a jury to read this letter and other letters and emails that will prove financial crimes were committed. 

I know Petersen Dean does not allow you to communicate with me other than to try to force me to settle against myself and accept some version of devastating, unjust and life destroying loss and this ZERO COMMUNICATION POLICY began in January 2017 before you were hired, but since you frequently try to convince Judge Murphy to believe (in BC661819 ) that you actually DO try to communicate, you at the very least should know it was a fact that we had a settlement underway in January 2017 and were arranging to have the solar panels removed after H&R BLOCK reviewed documents in 2016 and found out this was a property tax financing scam and informed me it wasn’t true that I would be getting $10,000 off via my property taxes. 

I was horrified when TWO contracts materialized that an electronic signature of my name and initials was deposited on and that the second contact was for $10,000. I kept asking why there was an additional $10,000 when I was told I was getting the deal where customers get the roof free if they go solar with Petersen Dean. I have a video tape of that offer. I was told not to worry, that I wouldn’t have to pay the $10,000, that it would “fall off” via property taxes. I immediately called Helena Shi about it. Both she and Mr Shanholtzer confirmed I was getting that free roof if you go solar deal. Helena Shi of
Peterson Dean Solar: hshi@PetersenDean.com (510) 946-2338.
I talked to Dave Shanholtzer of
Peterson Dean Solar about it.  dshanholtzer@petersendean.com   (714) 309-0837 (LA County is also investigating this). Matthew Monning:  (714) 858-9278, might lie under oath but I don’t believe Helena Shi and others will want to lie under oath to protect Petersen Dean.
The agreement was to remove the solar panels because they were not the price I was quoted and I could not afford them. Then suddenly without explanation Matthew Monning and Helena Shi were not allowed to talk to me anymore, just like you are not allowed to really communicate with me, Mr Karimzadeh. Matthew Monning blocked my emails.
All these Petersen Dean employees will be called upon to testify in this case and in other cases that will arise until this matter is properly settled. Multiple agencies are investigating this property tax financing scam and one way or another, this matter will eventually come to justice.
You have not discussed what happened in 2016 with me yet you want me to attend a settlement conference with you and to agree to things without having any understanding of the events of 2016 between us. Your client still wants to steam roll me and that is why he won’t allow you to have any meaningful communication with me.
This email establishes, again, that lack of communication. I am verifying it for the record in BC661819 and sharing this information with related investigations.

“For the records: There has been no discussion of the actual events of 2016 between me and Attorney Sam Karimzadeh. Mr. Karimzadeh sought to proceed to the settle phase without ANY discussion of the job performed by Petersen Dean in 2016 and the financing arrangements of 2016.”

It is my understanding that Petersen Dean just wants Judge Murphy to fork over our home ASAP without any discussion of the events of 2016, to allow you to seize our home simply over procedure errors, paperwork problems that happened because I am in pro per and never went to law school, not on the merits of the case. Even with The Public Law Center doing intake to find a match for this expensive case with cross complaint, Petersen Dean is frantic about avoiding a trial by jury by hook or by crook. It is confusing to be sued and to find the person who sued you is desperate not to have a trial by jury. This is yet another of MANY RED FLAGS in an ongoing pattern that suggests a strong consciousness of guilt. Petersen Dean sought to swiftly abuse the MECHANICS LIEN process, seize a property and thereby destroy evidence of the 2016 property tax financing. Petersen Dean never had any intention of discussing the events of 2016 in a court of law. There is a pattern of behavior that Petersen Dean does not want to be reviewed by a jury. Usually when a person brings a matter before the court, they WANT the events reviewed.

Petersen Dean’s desperate need to skip discovery and just have Judge Murphy fork over the only home that we have ever owned, that KEEP YOUR HOME CALIFORNIA helped us keep, makes it seem like Petersen Dean is the one facing homeless, not my autistic son and I.

Sincerely,
Jennifer Marshall