ON MARCH 22, 2018 THE JUDGE IN CASE BC661819 SAID I SHOULD TRY TO COMMUNICATE WITH PETERSEN DEAN.
PETERSEN DEAN IS NOT LIKELY TO COMPLY WITH THE JUDGE'S SUGGESTION THAT WE COMMUNICATE. SO FAR THEIR ATTORNEY HAS REFUSED TO ANSWER MY CALLS OR RESPOND TO EMAILS FOR WELL OVER A YEAR.
Case BC661819
Dear Petersen Dean, Michelle Meyer,
The judge in BC661819 said we should communicate. Your brief email
also welcomed me to ask questions.
I have asked this one question many times for several years but
Petersen Dean and HERO both have refused to answer this question since November
2016:
“In 2016 my credit score was 420 and dipped lower due to a problem
with OCWEN that the CFPB investigated. Dave Shanholtzer was aware that HERO
financing was the only type of financing that I was qualified. This is also
heavily and fully documented in CFPB records. The only financing I qualified
for in 2016 was HERO financing.
My question:
How did George Milionis and Matthew Monning expect me to be able
to pay after they conspired with Damon Sherman of HERO to circumvent the terms
of the HERO financing contract that Petersen Dean wanted nulled by revoking the
HERO financing?
HERO’s first response was to resolve the problem of HR Block
discovering that it was a tax credit scam by removing the solar panels, by
doing the right thing.
The solar panels were to be removed in the same time period that
Petersen Dean filed 2 Mechanics Liens INSTEAD of removing the panels as agreed.
Petersen Dean employees including Helena Shi are witnesses to the fact that the
solar panels were to be removed. Not all of them can be convinced to commit
perjury under oath and claim they were not coordinating with me regarding
removing the panels while George Milionis was pulling a fast one and filing 2
Mechanics Liens that HERO’S Damon Shermon assured me Mr Milionis was not really
going to file. Mr. Damon Sherman told me that George Milionis was not really
going to file a lien on my home. I believe these coordinated lies were
orchestrated to buy time and stall me from reporting to the CSLB so that
Petersen Dean could seize my home before the CSLB could do inspections and
investigate the matter. With hindsight I wish to God I had filed the CSLB
complaint in November 2016 instead of trusting Mr. Damon Sherman at HERO and
his friend Mr. Matthew Monning at Petersen Dean when they assured me I was
protected by the HERO SENIOR PROTECTION PROGRAM, which after months of delays I
learned does not really exist. No protection from Petersen Dean violations of
HERO promises was afforded to me and on two occasions HERO claimed they would
no longer finance the project. HERO dumped me, then denied (in writing) dumping
me, then dumped me again and refused to communicate with me. I never heard of a
bank or financing company doing this to a customer before. I can only think it
must be an attempt to cover up financial crime that an investigation would
uncover. George Milionis told me “HERO has nothing to do with this, that from
now on it is only you and me”.
I cannot imagine that any customer would be convinced not to tell
anyone that they started out with HERO financing but after a construction
accident that the contractor did not want to pay a licensed contractor to
remediate and then HR Block examining the documents and reporting the figures
were padded and that it was a very bold lie that “it would pay for itself” when
in fact it would cost me three times more for electricity than if I didn’t go
solar, I cannot imagine this sort of intimidation working unless the threat of
violence was added to it. Kyle Smith, Matthew Monning and other men who called
to intimidate me kept insinuating that if I did not meet them alone at my
property and sign the document they would bring with them, it would be beyond
my imagination the suffering my son and I would face if they had to hand me
over to George Milionis for not doing as they told me. I did not know what that
meant but I told my home insurance adjuster Mr. David Klein that I was so
grateful that he had us in Emergency Housing where the hotel staff would protect
us if any Petersen Dean thugs tried to force me to sign the document. The staff
of the Marriott helped me fax documents and make copies to mail to the CSLB so
we would not have to go to our gutted house to use my fax there where I might
get trapped alone with men from Petersen Dean. Kyle Smith wanted to come by
himself to meet me at my house and stay with me for days cleaning the stucco
powder why my ill son sat in a car the whole day each day. I told him that was
crazy and there was no water source. He kept pushing the idea, offering to loan
me $500 of his own money to pay for equipment I would need from Home Depot so
he and I could work together instead of Petersen Dean hiring MIDA REMEDIATION
or any of the other remediation companies to do the work safely. Matthew
Monning wanted two men to meet me alone in the gutted house.
On one occasion when I came to the house to get mail and
documents, I saw a shadow in the garage and screamed. It turned out to be
nothing but my son also had become afraid of our house as well. I don’t know
what the Petersen Dean men might have done to me if I met them alone like they
kept pressuring me to in November and December 2016. My fear was that they
would cause some kind of “accident” for me and my son to prevent me from reporting
the strange financial manipulations they were doing.
Employees at BUILDING AND SAFETY may also be brought forth to
testify that at that time they confirmed Petersen Dean did not apply for a
solar permit refund in January 2017 and also confirmed Petersen Dean had not
bothered to get the permit they needed to alter my water heater on November 2,
2016.
The question again:
“How did Petersen Dean expect a home owner to pay when they
conspired with HERO financing to revoke the only financing, the only method of
payment the homeowner qualified for in 2016?”
Please answer the question that you have refused to answer for two
years. The judge said he wants you to communicate with me. Please answer this
question that goes to the heart of this case.
Refusal to answer this question makes this unlike ANY financing
done by ANY other bank and financing institution in the nation.
Bank of America, Citi Bank, Synchrony Bank, not even OCWEN asks
customers to forego having a hard copy of a proposed, amended contract mailed
to them and instead meet them at a construction site where they will have $2000
in one hand ( half of the $4000 MIDA estimated for the remediation and none of
the money for the electrical damage and rotten wood) and the mystery contract
would be in the other hand, the $2000 to be released from the one hand upon
signature of the contract in the other hand. Mr. Matthew Monning described this
to me.
The police in at the police station in San Pedro told me not to go
to this “meeting”, to consult a lawyer instead.
Said meeting to be held here:
If it looks like, acts like, is conducted like, and functions like
“mobster” financing, it probably is financial fraud, it probably is illegal,
mobster financing.
The way Petersen Dean men I had never met before suddenly started
calling me, threatening me, desperately attempting to force me to sign
documents they wouldn’t dare mail me no matter how many times I requested a
hard copy and told them no more “electronic” signatures deposited on documents,
the way they hounded me and hanged up on me was suspicious and grew to be
terrifying because different Petersen Dean men kept insisting upon meeting me
alone in a gutted construction site have me sign the document they refused to
mail to me. It was not normal. No business had EVER acted this way. I feared
they were mafia. I went to the police because it was terrifying and I feared
for our lives. No business in my life EVER conducted business this way and I am
65. I have seen a lot of businesses and NONE of them acted like that. I have
ONLY heard of mobsters operating this way. I have NEVER heard of a legitimate
business operating this way.
Please answer the question and explain why your client simply
revokes financing when they suddenly no longer want to comply with the terms of
that financing and why this should be a legal option for any business in the
USA to be able to revoke financing when they suddenly find the terms
inconvenient? How is this even remotely legal? If all businesses were allowed
to revoke financing when the mood struck, there would be no way to regulate and
no consumer protection possible.
I have been waiting years for your answer.
Sincerely,
Jennifer Marshall
Dear Michelle Meyer,
My question is where did the HERO contract disappear to? It
clearly states that the job is not to be paid until all repairs are made. (See
copy of HERO ad below). Repairs were not made and on the week Helena Shi of
Peterson Dean Solar stated the solar panels were to be removed as agreed with
me, HERO and Petersen Dean, the Mechanics Liens were placed instead of abiding
by the resolution agreed upon.
Also, is Petersen Dean appealing the CSLB violations to buy time
to seize our home before the CSLB hearing with the Attorney General. Is it your
intention to tell the Attorney General that the CSLB violations no longer
matter because you have seized the property in question and you don’t care if
there is rotten wood, damaged electrical, air vent stucco powder remediation
still to be done and a sharp ongoing decline in the health of James Marshall
due to the years of intense stress Petersen Dean promised to inflict unless we
signed a document in November 2016 to give up all our rights BEFORE Petersen
Dean would do the repairs and remove the solar panels.
James Marshall might die as a result of the promised and delivered
“unimaginable” stress I was warned about by Petersen Dean’s Kyle Smith and
other Peter Dean men who called with the same ultimatum of what would happen if
we did not sign the document. My son’s health is rapidly declining.
Are you doing this to us to attempt to get out of having the CSLB
violations show on your record?
The judge in BC661818 said we should try to communicate. The judge
does not yet know Petersen Dean told me there would be no more communication if
I refused to sign that form. I was informed in writing by George Milionis what
my ONLY options were....which was a clear violation of the HERO contract and the
reason you concealed that contract from the law to date.
None of my phone calls have been returned by Petersen Dean since
the Illegal ultimatum. HERO also refused to speak to me after they revoked the
financing so you could begin the Mechanics Liens process on the unfinished
job.
Both Petersen Dean and HERO blocked me on twitter, an unheard of
action in the legitimate business world. Delta, United, McDonalds, Target, Bank
of America and any reputable business you can think of have that in common, they
don’t block customers. Refusing to speak to a customer, concealing the original
contract, attempting to bribe and threaten a customer is not normal. We have
been in fear for our lives since we experienced your idea of “business”.
You promised to make us homeless and we have lived in terror every
moment since November 2016 when you ended normal life for us with your illegal
ultimatum....”sign or face an “unimaginable” irreversible fate.”
I pray it is reversible and that James does not die.
Let me know clearly what your intentions are and what you hope to
accomplish by what you are doing. Our financial damages as a result of your
ongoing and wrongful actions against us far exceed what you claim we owe you.
If my son dies as a result of your unrelenting and unjustified acts, I pray
your license is revoked and that your partner HERO / Renovate America is also
barred from trapping families in a no way out tax credit scam so that no more
families will ever have to suffer this again.
Let me know what you expect to gain by your illegal actions. We
deserve to know the truth. Is it to hide bigger crimes? Do you expect the truth
to die with us and escape prosecution for financial fraud?
Sincerely,
Jennifer Marshall
THE JUDGE SAID I SHOULD TRY TO COMMUNICATE WITH PETERSEN DEAN.
TO DATE THIS IS THE ONLY COMMUNICATION FROM PETERSEN DEAN AND IT WAS ONLY SENT BECAUSE THE JUDGE SPECIFICALLY ORDERED PETERSEN DEAN TO SEND IT.
PETERSEN DEAN TOLD THE JUDGE THAT THEY DID NOT HAVE MY EMAIL. THE JUDGE REMINDED PETERSEN DEAN THAT MY EMAIL WAS ON ALL THE COURT DOCUMENTS BUT READ IT OUT LOUD TO PETERSEN DEAN AS WELL SO THERE WOULD BE NO EXCUSE. THE JUDGE ALSO ORDERED PETERSEN DEAN TO SERVE ME DOCUMENTS PROPERLY BUT THAT REMAINS TO BE SEEN IF PETERSEN DEAL WILL COMPLY.
PETERSEN DEAN LIED TO THE JUDGE AND CLAIMED THEY ALSO HAD NOT BEEN PROPERLY SERVED. I REMINDED THE JUDGE THAT MY PROOF OF SERVICES WERE STAMPED BY THE COURT AND FILED WITH THE COURT AND EACH DOCUMENT HAD BEEN SIGNED BY A UNITED STATES POSTMASTER WHO WOULD BE AVAILABLE TO TESTIFY IN COURT IF NEEDED THAT THEY DID MAIL THE DOCUMENTS. I USED POSTMASTERS INSTEAD OF JUST ASKING REGULAR CITIZENS TO DO THE TASK BECAUSE I KNEW PETERSEN DEAN WOULD ATTACK THE INTEGRITY OF A REGULAR CITIZEN.
PETERSEN DEAN COMMITS PERJURY AS IF IT MEANS NOTHING TO DO SO. HOPEFULLY PETERSEN DEAN WILL BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR THE MULTIPLE COUNTS OF PERJURY WHEN THIS CASE IS RESOLVED.
Hello, Ms. Marshall:
Attached you will fine the Notice of Case Management Conference and proof a
service. A hard copy will follow this email via first class mail. Should you
have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you, have a
wonderful day.
Michelle
D. Meyer
Case
Assistant
PetersenDean
Roofing and Solar
