STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA COMPLAINT AGAINST GEORGE MILIONIS

STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA

Complaint Review Unit

Office of The General Counsel

180 Howard Street

San Francisco, California 94105-1617

July 24, 2018

Inquiry Number 18-20383

Dear State Bar of California Complaint Review Unit,

I respectfully request a review my three separate complaints regarding three separate attorneys that got lumped together as one. I believe the more serious complaint is the one against Attorney George Milionis and that lumping him with less serious offenses was a mistake. Perhaps the mistake was mainly mine for reporting unprofessional behavior of two attorneys from the same firm at the same time I reported what I believe to be the criminal behavior of George Milionis.

Mr. Milionis is deliberately abusing the MECHANICS LIENS process and using the process as his personal tool to avoid detection of PETERSEN DEAN and HERO FINANCING’S multiple wrong doings and to cover up financial fraud PETERSEN DEAN committed with HERO FINANCING when they acted as HERO’S unlicensed broker.

As per the enclosed HOMEOWNER’S GUIDE TO PREVENTING MECHANICS LIENS, there is a LIEN REQUIREMENTS CHECKLIST. Mr. George Milionis knows full well he did not meet those requirements. He is aware he is not using MECHANICS LIENS correctly for the purpose that they exist for. MECHANICS LEINS used to cover up a crime is nefarious and such an attorney should not be allowed to continue committing financial crimes with impunity.

Mr. Milionis knows that a job must be completed before he can place a MECHANICS LIEN. In June 2018 Petersen Dean paid a $500 citation (Copy of Citation enclosed) to the CSLB for not removing and replacing rotten wood, for covering rotten wood with new shingles, for not doing the work they were hired to do up to standard. That citation will remain on Petersen Dean’s record for five years and yet Mr. Milionis shrugs it off as if it is nothing because the fine was laughably small and he can still leave the work unfinished, still leave rotten wood under the new shingles, still remove the financing and demand more money than was agreed for the job and still file Mechanics Liens to cover up the financial fraud. Petersen Dean and George Milionis flaunt their lawlessness in your face, in the court’s face, in my face. Mr. Milionis clearly feels he may act with impunity and that the laws that apply to others do not apply to him and his client PETERSEN DEAN.

Mr. Milionis knows the CSLB Lien Checklist requires that the homeowner must accept the improvement and be using the improvement and he knows the job was never completed, that the homeowner did not sign off the completion documents with HERO FINANCING because was never completed in 2016. The solar panels were never turned on all these years. DWP never inspected the panels. Both HERO and PETERSEN DEAN agreed to remove the solar panels after H&R Block indicated that I most certainly would not receive $10,000 tax credit because as a senior citizen caring for my adult autistic son, we do not pay taxes. Mr. Milionis decided to withdraw the HERO FINANCING and pretend it never existed and he proceeded to deliberately misuse the MECHANICS LIEN process to cover up financial fraud that had become noticed by the homeowner’s tax preparer Mr. Martin of H&R Block.

I believe many of the actions of Mr. Milionis rise to a criminal level.

The other two SEPARATE complaints against Mr. Karimzadeh and Mr. Mendoza, (all three given the same INQUIRY NUMBER) are for unprofessional conduct and do not rise to a criminal level. Lumping all three separate attorneys under one INQUIRY served to water down the very serious complaint against George Milionis. Mr. Mendoza was toying with me. Mr. Karimzadeh was faking having communication with me just so he could say he tried but I wouldn’t’ cooperate. He made no real effort to discuss the case with me. Who sues a person then refuses to communicate with them?

Mr. Karimzadeh was unprofessional and did not make any true effort to have a legitimate meet and confer with me. He wanted Judge Murphy to believe true communication was offered but in his emails to me you can clearly see no real settlement offers were discussed, no mention of the financing was discussed. Mr. Karimzadeh limited his communication to trying to manipulate me to give up my right to a trial by jury. He refused to discuss any details of the case with me. That is not an opinion. That is supported by his emails, our only means of communication. The emails do not show any good faith discussion of the case and the financing. Mr. Mendoza asked questions about the incomplete work….questions he knew the answer to because the CSLB citation made it clear…and he was not the attorney of record. Mr. Karimzadeh did not discuss the incomplete work, the rotten wood under new shingles, the removal of the solar panels or ANY of the details of the financing and the case. He stubbornly refused to discuss the financing that had vanished into thin air. Where did the HERO financing go? Why is PETERSEN DEAN allowed to get rid of HERO and call for $34,000 cash ($10,000 more than agreed) without financing and without finishing the job?

Mr. Mendoza emailed me until I told him to stop. There was no reason for him to contact me at all, even once, ever. Mr. Karimzadeh is the attorney of record and it was his job to tell me anything that Mr. Mendoza told me. I only answered Mr. Mendoza because I thought he acted like he was taking over the case for Mr. Karimzadeh. These two men both behaved unprofessionally. I filled out separate complaints for each attorney because no attorney deserves to be lumped together and accused of another attorney’s behavior and actions. Especially when those actions of one individual rise to a criminal level.

I believe George Milionis is a criminal and that he has done great harm to many homeowners in the State of California. Please separate his Inquiry from the other two nuisance complaints for attorneys acting unprofessionally and take a second look at the actions of George Milionis.

It is my opinion that George Milionis should not be practicing law in the State of California in light of how he has blatantly, undeniably, deliberately abused the MECHANICS LIENS process. Mr. Milionis is making up his own MECHANICS LEINS laws as he goes along. He changes the MECHANICS LIENS law to suit his need and uses it as a weapon to control and intimidate people, wielding the threat of the MECHANICS LIENS in writing to force signatures from homeowners long before the job is finished, YEARS before the job is finished in this case. Mr. Milionis helps PETERSEN DEAN broker HERO FINANCING without a license and revokes the financing and demands instant cash payment in full, more money than agree upon and with no financing if someone (in my case H&R Block) discovers the property tax financing fraud in progress.

Please take a second, closer look at this.

Thank you for considering this matter.

Sincerely,

Jennifer Marshall

*******************************************************************

COPY OF LETTER SENT TO PETERSEN DEAN AS PER CSLB BOOKLET:

FROM: Jennifer E. Marshall

April 9, 2017

VIA CERTIFIED MAIL

TO: Petersen Dean, Inc.

39300 Civic Center Drive, Suite 300

Fremont, California 94538

RE: INVALID LIEN 20170093119

       INVALID LIEN 29170093193

Dear Petersen Dean, Inc,

I was not served a copy of the two liens in question. I purchased copies from the courthouse in El Segundo, California via check and have the receipt.

Both liens are invalid because they do not adhere to the strict time frames and lien requirements.

Both liens are invalid because the job was abandoned by you on November 2, 2016.

The work and necessary repairs were not completed. The stucco powder you refused to hire Building Cleaning Services or any other reputable cleaning service to remove has drifted and contaminated the entire house making it uninhabitable. Numerous contractors interviewed to rebuild the kitchen refused to enter the house until the stucco powder is remediated as it made them instantly feel sick. I suffered a bloody nose, sore throat and burning eyes. My autistic son James developed a severe lung infection. Assurant Insurance paid for air quality testing of the entire house. The powder you refused to remove from my son’s room on November 2, 2016 has contaminated the air vents and the carpeting and is everywhere now. The mold remediation being done in the kitchen by Assurant was disrupted by your abandonment of the job on November 2, 2016 and put on hold until you made the air quality safe again, which you still have not done.

The solar panels are not in use. You agreed in writing to remove the solar panels after H&R Block examined your figures and determined that I would not receive ANY of the savings, that it was a tax credit scam. You did not remove the panels as agreed. The roof is creaking and you did not fix that or any of the items you previous agreed to repair. A complete list of everything you didn’t finish and left in disrepair is attached to the CSLB claim and is being verified by the Contractors State Licensing Board Case Number: SF20169935.

I hereby request that you immediately remove both of the invalid liens. If I have to hire an attorney to make you remove the invalid liens, I am instructed to remind you that I am entitled to be awarded all reasonable attorney fees.

Sincerely,

Jennifer E. Marshall

********************************************************************

I SENT PETERSEN DEAN THE ABOVE CERTIFIED LETTER AS PER THESE CSLB BOOKLET INSTRUCTIONS:

*************************************************************************

ADDITIONAL INVESTIGATIONS, DISCOVERY & DOCUMENTATION OF ZERO COMMUNICATION POLICY OF HERO AND PETERSEN DEAN

UPDATED LETTER TO PETERSEN DEAN'S ATTORNEY SAM KARIMZADEH

INSURANCE FRAUD ON TOP OF FINANCIAL FRAUD
CC: CAP SPECIALTY INSURANCE
CC: CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE

CC:
LOS ANGELES COUNTY CONSUMER & BUSINESS AFFAIRS   

INTERNAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT

ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES

INVESTIGATION OF HERO AND PETERSEN DEAN 2016 JOB ON JENNIFER MARSHALL PROPERTY / PROPERTY TAX FINANCING FRAUD / INSURANCE FRAUD 

CC: Sam Luquin: Los Angeles & Business Consumer Affairs

UPDATED LETTER,  WITH NEW INFO RE CAP SPECIALTY LETTER WITH FALSE INFORMATION WRITTEN BY A PETERSEN DEAN ATTORNEY TO DECEIVE CAP SPECIALTY FOR THE PURPOSE OF ESCAPING LIABILITY

PETERSEN DEAN IS NOT LOOKING FORWARD TO THEIR DAY IN COURT, IN FACT THEY ARE FRANTIC TO AVOID A TRIAL BY JURY.

Dear Mr. Karimzadeh, Attorney for PETERSEN DEAN:

After the November 2, 2016 stucco accident (where a Petersen Dean attorney lied IN WRITING to CAP SPECIALTY INSURANCE, (which I was given a copy of ), indicating PETERSEN DEAN "had to do stucco work IN THE GARAGE", where there happens to be no stucco and that only a few pieces of silverware and a few dishes got coated with stucco powder, that powder moved in mysterious ways and miraculously stayed out of my my son's lungs, cut around corners and refused to go into the air vents and bypassed everything we owned and that two separate, unrelated, licensed remediation contractors, BUILDING CLEANING SERVICES and MIDA CLEANING SERVICES who provided PETERSEN DEAN with estimates wanted $4,000 + to clean a few pieces of silverware and a few dishes that PETERSEN DEAN offered to clean with leaf blowers and that the emergency room that treated James for the lung and breathing problems he had after inhaling powder from the cloud that filled his room and covered his bed, his clothing and all his toys, books and possessions while he was asleep in on November 2, 2016 in his room....all this, according to PETERSEN DEAN'S ATTORNEY'S letter to CAP SPECIALTY was nothing.... reduced to just a few forks and dishes. 

We should have scientists do a special investigation into this very talented stucco dust that has the ability to pick and chose what it will land upon, to form a cloud, go into a house and garage and refuse to land on most possessions, walls, ceilings, air vents, lungs and just specifically pick out a few items to land on. 

Even the contractors who were there that day will not commit perjury about magic stucco powder. They will NOT swear under penalty of perjury that they were doing stucco work IN THE GARAGE that had no stucco in it. They will not back the lie the PETERSEN DEAN attorney put in writing to CAP SPECIALTY that they were doing stucco work inside the garage. They know there was no stucco in the garage and they won't throw away their lives to protect PETERSEN DEAN with this ridiculous lie. Those contractors will not support the lies PETERSEN DEAN'S ATTORNEY put in writing to CAP SPECIALTY INSURANCE. You would be hard pressed to find any contractor on earth willing to throw away their life for such a foolish lie.

Probably no homeowner has stucco inside their garage. Have you every been inside a garage that has stucco on the interior walls? This has to be the sloppiest lie ever told and PETERSEN DEAN either believes CAP SPECIALTY is unbelievably stupid or willing to go along with criminal activity backed by ridiculous lies that no one would believe. 

PETERSEN DEAN contractors opened the garage and did not bother to close it when they finished altering the water heater. They were horrified by the mess they made, apologized and told their supervisor it would take them four days or more to clean up the mess they made, that they were not qualified to do the remediation and that they couldn't clean my son's bedding and clothes and toys, that they could not do it. They were told by their supervisors to do the remediation with leaf blowers.  

There was no reason to fill our house with stucco powder.  This was the sloppiest lie I ever read in my life and it is my belief that PETERSEN DEAN is desperate to avoid a trial by jury because they do not want a jury to read this letter and other letters and emails that will prove financial crimes were committed. 

I know Petersen Dean does not allow you to communicate with me other than to try to force me to settle against myself and accept some version of devastating, unjust and life destroying loss and this ZERO COMMUNICATION POLICY began in January 2017 before you were hired, but since you frequently try to convince Judge Murphy to believe (in BC661819 ) that you actually DO try to communicate, you at the very least should know it was a fact that we had a settlement underway in January 2017 and were arranging to have the solar panels removed after H&R BLOCK reviewed documents in 2016 and found out this was a property tax financing scam and informed me it wasn’t true that I would be getting $10,000 off via my property taxes. 

I was horrified when TWO contracts materialized that an electronic signature of my name and initials was deposited on and that the second contact was for $10,000. I kept asking why there was an additional $10,000 when I was told I was getting the deal where customers get the roof free if they go solar with Petersen Dean. I have a video tape of that offer. I was told not to worry, that I wouldn’t have to pay the $10,000, that it would “fall off” via property taxes. I immediately called Helena Shi about it. Both she and Mr Shanholtzer confirmed I was getting that free roof if you go solar deal. Helena Shi of
Peterson Dean Solar: hshi@PetersenDean.com (510) 946-2338.
I talked to Dave Shanholtzer of
Peterson Dean Solar about it.  dshanholtzer@petersendean.com   (714) 309-0837 (LA County is also investigating this). Matthew Monning:  (714) 858-9278, might lie under oath but I don’t believe Helena Shi and others will want to lie under oath to protect Petersen Dean.
The agreement was to remove the solar panels because they were not the price I was quoted and I could not afford them. Then suddenly without explanation Matthew Monning and Helena Shi were not allowed to talk to me anymore, just like you are not allowed to really communicate with me, Mr Karimzadeh. Matthew Monning blocked my emails.
All these Petersen Dean employees will be called upon to testify in this case and in other cases that will arise until this matter is properly settled. Multiple agencies are investigating this property tax financing scam and one way or another, this matter will eventually come to justice.
You have not discussed what happened in 2016 with me yet you want me to attend a settlement conference with you and to agree to things without having any understanding of the events of 2016 between us. Your client still wants to steam roll me and that is why he won’t allow you to have any meaningful communication with me.
This email establishes, again, that lack of communication. I am verifying it for the record in BC661819 and sharing this information with related investigations.

“For the records: There has been no discussion of the actual events of 2016 between me and Attorney Sam Karimzadeh. Mr. Karimzadeh sought to proceed to the settle phase without ANY discussion of the job performed by Petersen Dean in 2016 and the financing arrangements of 2016.”

It is my understanding that Petersen Dean just wants Judge Murphy to fork over our home ASAP without any discussion of the events of 2016, to allow you to seize our home simply over procedure errors, paperwork problems that happened because I am in pro per and never went to law school, not on the merits of the case. Even with The Public Law Center doing intake to find a match for this expensive case with cross complaint, Petersen Dean is frantic about avoiding a trial by jury by hook or by crook. It is confusing to be sued and to find the person who sued you is desperate not to have a trial by jury. This is yet another of MANY RED FLAGS in an ongoing pattern that suggests a strong consciousness of guilt. Petersen Dean sought to swiftly abuse the MECHANICS LIEN process, seize a property and thereby destroy evidence of the 2016 property tax financing. Petersen Dean never had any intention of discussing the events of 2016 in a court of law. There is a pattern of behavior that Petersen Dean does not want to be reviewed by a jury. Usually when a person brings a matter before the court, they WANT the events reviewed.

Petersen Dean’s desperate need to skip discovery and just have Judge Murphy fork over the only home that we have ever owned, that KEEP YOUR HOME CALIFORNIA helped us keep, makes it seem like Petersen Dean is the one facing homeless, not my autistic son and I.

Sincerely,
Jennifer Marshall 

PETERSEN DEAN CONCEALED HERO FINANCING FROM THE COURTS

PETERSEN DEAN, INC put a great deal of effort in concealing from the courts that there was an open CONTRACTORS STATE LICENSE BOARD case against them. PETERSEN DEAN, INC also tried to intimidate the homeowner to conceal that HERO / RENOVATE AMERICA FINANCING existed in this case.

Hiding the financing for a project is a tall order. PETERSEN DEAN, INC has been operating above the law for so long that they became reckless. 

An example of the over the top recklessness, PETERSEN DEAN'S sales tactic is to embellish the tax credit scam lie to customers that they know will never qualify for the "free" roof in their combination "Free Roof and If You Go Solar" deal as a grand distraction. PETERSEN DEAN'S salesman repeatedly shocks you by telling you that you can cheat the IRS by not telling them you got a combination deal and by reporting the roof cost, (that you won't actually be paying when you get $10,000 + in tax credits), to report that roof material costs as part of the solar panel materials costs. PETERSEN DEAN goes overboard REPEATEDLY embellishing the large or LARGER amount of tax credit the customer can get if they are willing to lie to the IRS in order to steer the customer away form discussing that you have to be in a certain tax bracket to qualify for ANY tax credit.

If you are a senior citizen on SSI, you won't be in the tax bracket to receive the so called "free roof". If you are foolish enough to lie to the IRS as PETERSEN DEAN suggests so can get you an even bigger tax credit, you may end up in Federal Prison. 

\

Both HERO and PETERSEN DEAN target senior citizens. PETERSEN DEAN targets with SENIOR DISCOUNTS and HERO even had a phony SENIOR PROTECTION PROGRAM (they got angry at you if you kept asking to be referred to the nonexistent department for help) to give potential customers a false sense of security to trust the lies their contractor PETERSEN DEAN would tell them after their HERO APPLICATION to access the equity in their home was approved. The financing is set up so that the customer won't find out they have been lied to until a year after PETERSEN DEAN and HERO are long gone and off the hook.

MOTION TO STRIKE

MOTION TO STRIKE

Beware PETERSEN DEAN ROOFING AND SOLAR INC and their business partner HERO PROGRAM / RENOVATE AMERICA. They can turn a simple home repair in to a very long nightmare.

My autistic son James and I do not have legal representation yet, so we will be in court tomorrow morning and will file this MOTION TO STRIKE and a CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT. We are doing our best to stay alive and survive this extremely lengthy nightmare.




JENNIFER MARSHALL, DEFENDANT

Harbor City, CA 





                                  SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

PETERSEN DEAN, INC.
Plaintiff,
vs.
JENNIFER MARSHALL,
Defendant )
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
) Case No. BC661819

MOTION TO STRIKE
I respectfully request that Case BC661819 be dismissed with prejudice for the following reasons:
Whereas PETERSEN DEAN has not completed the job it wishes to be paid for, it was not appropriate to file the TWO MECHANICS LIENS preemptively to circumvent justice, destroy and bury evidence of financial fraud committed with HERO FINANCING as reported in CFPB CASE: 170111-001935 and avoid completeing the work that PETERSEN DEAN decided was not profitable for them to complete. That the work was not finished is documented in the open CSLB Case: SF20169935 PETERSEN DEAN and also documented in the open CAP SPECIALTY BOND INSURANCE CASE: 00180540-06 #0041327141.
Whereas the multiple agency (CSLB, CFPB, CAP SPECIALTY INSURANCE, et al) documented damage to my property, myself and my autistic son JAMES MARSHALL done by PETERSEN DEAN far exceeds the amount of money PETERSEN DEAN is asking for, I respectfully request that this case be dismissed with prejudice.
JENNIFER MARSHALL
SIGNED:________________________________
                JENNIFER MARSHALL                                                Dated this 21st day of January, 2018

 

HERO FINANCING BLOCKS CUSTOMERS WHEN HERO CONTRACTORS GET CAUGHT CHEATING

Date: Saturday, December 16, 2017 2:40 PM From: Jennifer E Marshall  To: doris.velasquez@cslb.ca.gov, CSLB Lidia Moitoso-Champion <lidia.moitoso-champion@cslb.ca.gov>, piu@doj.ca.gov, CA Dept Of Insurance <thomas.goetzinger@insurance.ca.gov>, mmonnig@petersendean.com, CapSpecialty Pat Framke Claim 00180540-06 # 0041327141 <bondclaims@capspecialty.com>, CapSpecialty Pat Framke Claim 00180540-06 # 0041327141 <pframke@CapSpecialty.com> Subject: Re: CSLB SF 2016 9935 Petersen Dean Case / Court Case BC661819

Update: HERO has continued to block receipt of ANY information from customer Jennifer Marshall. HERO publicly advertises they protect customers, with special protection for seniors when in fact they BLOCK all communications, refusing emails and phone calls from customers who are being victimized by their contractors. HERO FINANCING and PETERSEN DEAN conspired to remove HERO FINANCING from the records to allow theIr contractor PETERSEN DEAN to seize our home instead of completing the job, including the removal of rotten wood and other necessary, agreed upon repairs. HERO blocked it’s own approved financing of the project to clear the path for PETERSEN DEAN to file two Mechanics Liens instead of making repaires they insisted to Jennifer Marshall were too costly to make. In case number BC661819 PETERSEN DEAN then began asking the courts to allow foreclosure and sale of the home, deliberately concealing the financing and the unfinished work from the judge and in a bold act of perjury lied about attempting to properly serve court documents to the home owner, insisting the home owner was hiding in the house at the time Emergency Housing was documented and PETERSEN DEAN was fully aware of as was their insurance CAPSPECIALTY, having been sent that information via formal written complaint. The financial harm to Jennifer Marshall and her autistic son James far exceeds the cost of the home repairs HERO financed and their contractor PETERSEN DEAN agreed to complete but did not complete. The financial fraud resulted in derailment of other work being done to the house and stopped refinancing of the home to get out of any future harm from OCWEN. After the CFPB cleared the way for us to refinance and escape harm from OCWEN, HERO and PETERSEN DEAN then conspired and blocked the refinancing via misuse of Mechanics Liens. This in turn blocked 3 dental surgeries that my autistic son James was scheduled to have in 2016 to save his teeth damaged by medication, surgeries not covered by his insurance that were to be financed by the refinancing of the home, which HERO and PETERSEN DEAN blocked for so long that prosthodontics Dr Palani has determined as of October 2017 James Marshall’s teeth can no longer be capped, that it is too late to save his teeth and he is not able to wear false teeth due to his severe autism. The financial harm to our family continues to compound and is terrifying. Much of our loss is permanent. Our lungs will never be as healthy as they were. The termites have had over a year in the rotten wood PETERSEN DEAN refused to remove yet asked a judge to allow PETERSEN DEAN sell our home to be paid for this work they did not do and the damage is much worse and ongoing as PETERSEN DEAN still attempt to foreclosure on our house in-spite of not doing the agreed upon work. The sneak attack plan of HERO and PETERSEN DEAN was to steam roll and sell the house before any discovery could even begin. We pray that the discovery process will now begin in spite of PETERSEN DEAN and HERO FINANCING ‘s documented attempt to obstruct justice to get away with the tax credit scam confirmed by H&R Block’s review of the financial documents. Respectfully, Jennifer Marshall Previously sent: Emails from HERO denying they refused to communicate with me. Then HERO refused to communicate with me. Never before have I experienced financing that refused to communicate. > On Dec 16, 2017, at 12:42 PM, Jennifer E Marshall wrote: > > Attn: Doris Velasquez CSLB SF 2016 9935 Petersen Dean Case > > Attn: Attorney General / California Department of Justice > > Does home owner need to file a second CSLB case against Petersen Dean specifically for the financial fraud element? > > Please review ongoing court documents and evidence stored at: > PetersenDean.blogspot.com > > Dear DOJ and CSLB, > > Physical damage: To be clear, there is ongoing evidence that rotten termite infested wood was covered with new shingles by Petersen Dean. The creaking on the roof is louder with time and sounds like a heavy person is walking on the roof. Termite activity on the roof is verified by visible sight of tiny holes inside the house on the master bedroom ceiling that termite shavings are falling from. The loud creaking is coming from the same portion of the roof that shows termite activity on rotten wood that was not removed. Petersen Dean laughed off the wood trim that could not hold primer and paint as “thirsty wood”. There is obviously a lot of “thirsty wood” underneath the new shingles, with heavy solar panels on top of the fragile rotten wood that creaks like it is going to snap soon. I fully expect the solar panels to crash into the master bedroom or into my neighbors side yard, possibly causing death, severe injuries as well as property damage. My HOA might sue me because of Petersen Dean’s sloppy works. I contacted the SCLB to save me and my autistic son from being held accountable for what HERO and their contractor Petersen Dean have done to our property. > > A verifiable down payment for termite treatment by Pacific Coast Termite to be done after Petersen Dean removed all the rotten wood was paid in 2016. The rotten wood was never removed by Petersen Dean and the termites have continued eating for a whole year and counting because Petersen Dean chose not to remove the rotten wood and instead to put Mechanics Liens on our house to attempt to avoid having to remove the new shingles to remove the rotten wood they buried underneath those new shingles. Their plan was obviously to foreclosure and sell the termite infested roof as “new” to some unsuspecting buyer. This is financial fraud against me and my disabled son that HERO and Petersen Dean are trying to perpetuate more fraud against even more unsuspecting home buyers if they succeed in stealing our house. > > The TAX CREDIT SCAM portion of the complaint: > > FINANCIAL FRAUD DAMAGES in addition to physical damages: To be clear, the electrical inspection that was slated to be done by the CSLB was not scheduled and not completed. No Electrician from CSLB documented the sledgehammer electrical damage done by Petersen Dean to the electrical wiring in the garage. > > An electrical inspection by the CSLB of the solar panels that HERO/RENOVATE AMERICA and PETERSEN DEAN promised to remove after H&R Block reviewed the documents and stated it was a TAX CREDIT SCAM, was never completed by the CSLB, probably because everyone except Building & Safety believed Petersen Dean would keep their word and remove the solar panels. Petersen Dean and HERO financing did not keep their word. HERO and Petersen Dean deliberately used the time that lying about removing the solar panels provided them, to attempt to conceal the original HERO financing documentation, destroy records and file Mechanics Liens instead of completing the job. After Petersen Dean abandoned the unfinished job, Petersen Dean’s Attorney called me and told me, “HERO had nothing to do with this.” I informed Mr. George Milionis that I still had my emails proving my HERO project was approved and I may select one of their contractors. I selected Petersen Dean. I still have these records and have made copies to a blog so they do not “disappear”. HERO and Mr Milionis may have destroyed their copies of the HERO Financing application and acceptance emails but I saved all my copies and emails. > > BUILDING & SAFETY was the first to point out that in fact it appeared PETERSEN DEAN and HERO had no intention of removing the solar panels because PETERSEN DEAN balked at requesting the SOLAR PERMIT REFUND. PETERSEN DEAN not only neglected to apply for a SOLAR PERMIT REFUND, Petersen Dean and HERO both cut off communication with me when I told them H&RBlock’s findings and that BUILDING & SAFETY verified the SOLAR PERMIT REFUND had not been applied for. At that time PETERSEN DEAN and HERO both assured me they were preparing to remove the solar panels. > > I called Helena Shi, my solar contact at Petersen Dean to tell her Building & Safety told me no effort had been made by Petersen Dean to prepare for removing the panels. At that time Building & Safety also informed me that Petersen Dean did un-permitted work on my water heater, that Petersen Dean did not get a permit to alter my water heater. This is illegal. > > Helena Shi responded to my informing her that Building & Safety told me Petersen Dean was not really applying for the solar permit refund and had not drawn a permit to alter the water heater either with, “I’m not allowed to talk to you anymore.” My financing for the project, HERO, also informed me that they were not going to talk with me anymore. I later discovered, by going to the Courthouse and asking, that during this time period that HERO and PETERSEN DEAN said they were preparing to remove the panels, in fact they were removing documentation and attempting to conceal there had ever been Hero Financing and placing two MECHANICS LIENS on our house. > > Please advise me if I need to file a second CSLB complaint to deal solely with the financial fraud aspect of this matter or verify that the financial crimes are included in the same complaint as the physical property damages are. Thank you. > > Respectfully, > > Jennifer Marshall > > Photo of Inside of the house view where exterior rotten “thirsty wood” is located. Termite shavings are now falling into the house as the termites continue to eat the rotten wood HERO/PETERSEN DEAN left on our roof:

THE DISCOVERY PROCESS PETERSEN DEAN AND HERO TRIED TO COVER UP

Print UPDATE CSLB / DOJ RE: FRAUD/PETERSEN DEAN SOLAR AND HERO FINANCING Date: Saturday, December 16, 2017 12:42 PM From: Jennifer E Marshall Subject: CSLB SF 2016 9935 Petersen Dean Case / Court Case BC661819 Attn: Doris Velasquez CSLB SF 2016 9935 Petersen Dean Case Attn: Attorney General / California Department of Justice Does home owner need to file a second CSLB case against Petersen Dean specifically for the financial fraud element? Please review ongoing court documents and evidence stored at: PetersenDean.blogspot.com Dear DOJ and CSLB, Physical damage: To be clear, there is ongoing evidence that rotten termite infested wood was covered with new shingles by Petersen Dean. The creaking on the roof is louder with time and sounds like a heavy person is walking on the roof. Termite activity on the roof is verified by visible sight of tiny holes inside the house on the master bedroom ceiling that termite shavings are falling from. The loud creaking is coming from the same portion of the roof that shows termite activity on rotten wood that was not removed. Petersen Dean laughed off the wood trim that could not hold primer and paint as “thirsty wood”. There is obviously a lot of “thirsty wood” underneath the new shingles, with heavy solar panels on top of the fragile rotten wood that creaks like it is going to snap soon. I fully expect the solar panels to crash into the master bedroom or into my neighbors side yard, possibly causing death, severe injuries as well as property damage. My HOA might sue me because of Petersen Dean’s sloppy works. I contacted the CSLB to save me and my autistic son from being held accountable for what HERO and their contractor Petersen Dean have done to our property. A verifiable down payment for termite treatment by Pacific Coast Termite to be done after Petersen Dean removed all the rotten wood was paid in 2016. The rotten wood was never removed by Petersen Dean and the termites have continued eating for a whole year and counting because Petersen Dean chose not to remove the rotten wood and instead to put Mechanics Liens on our house to attempt to avoid having to remove the new shingles to remove the rotten wood they buried underneath those new shingles. Their plan was obviously to foreclosure and sell the termite infested roof as “new” to some unsuspecting buyer. This is financial fraud against me and my disabled son that HERO and Petersen Dean are trying to perpetuate more fraud against even more unsuspecting home buyers if they succeed in stealing our house. The TAX CREDIT SCAM portion of the complaint: FINANCIAL FRAUD DAMAGES in addition to physical damages: To be clear, the electrical inspection that was slated to be done by the CSLB was not scheduled and not completed. No Electrician from CSLB documented the sledgehammer electrical damage done by Petersen Dean to the electrical wiring in the garage. An electrical inspection by the CSLB of the solar panels that HERO/RENOVATE AMERICA and PETERSEN DEAN promised to remove after H&R Block reviewed the documents and stated it was a TAX CREDIT SCAM, was never completed by the CSLB, probably because everyone except Building & Safety believed Petersen Dean would keep their word and remove the solar panels. Petersen Dean and HERO financing did not keep their word. HERO and Petersen Dean deliberately used the time that lying about removing the solar panels provided them, to attempt to conceal the original HERO financing documentation, destroy records and file Mechanics Liens instead of completing the job. After Petersen  Dean abandoned the unfinished job, Petersen Dean’s Attorney called me and told me, “HERO had nothing to do with this.” I informed Mr. George Milionis that I still had my emails proving my HERO project was approved and I may select one of their contractors. I selected Petersen Dean. I still have these records and have made copies to a blog so they do not “disappear”.  HERO and Mr Milionis may have destroyed their copies of the HERO Financing application and acceptance emails but I saved all my copies and emails. BUILDING & SAFETY was the first to point out that in fact it appeared PETERSEN DEAN and HERO had no intention of removing the solar panels because PETERSEN DEAN balked at requesting the SOLAR PERMIT REFUND. PETERSEN DEAN not only neglected to apply for a SOLAR PERMIT REFUND, Petersen Dean and HERO both cut off communication with me when I told them H&RBlock’s findings and that BUILDING & SAFETY verified the SOLAR PERMIT REFUND had not been applied for. At that time PETERSEN DEAN and HERO both assured me they were preparing to remove the solar panels. I called Helena Shi, my solar contact at Petersen Dean to tell her Building & Safety told me no effort had been made by Petersen Dean to prepare for removing the panels. At that time Building & Safety also informed me that Petersen Dean did un-permitted work on my water heater, that Petersen Dean did not get a permit to alter my water heater. This also is illegal. Helena Shi responded to my informing her that Building & Safety told me Petersen Dean was not really applying for the solar permit refund and had not drawn a permit to alter the water heater either with, “I’m not allowed to talk to you anymore.” My financing for the project, HERO, also informed me that they were not going to talk with me anymore. I later discovered, by going to the Courthouse and asking, that during this time period that HERO and PETERSEN DEAN said they were preparing to remove the panels, in fact they were removing documentation and attempting to conceal there had ever been Hero Financing and placing two MECHANICS LIENS on our house. Please advise me if I need to file a second CSLB complaint to deal solely with the financial fraud aspect of this matter or verify that the financial crimes are included in the same complaint as the physical property damages are. Thank you. Respectfully, Jennifer Marshall Photo of Inside of the house view where exterior rotten “thirsty wood” is located. Termite shavings are now falling into the house as the termites continue to eat the rotten wood HERO/PETERSEN DEAN left on our roof: